|
SCIENCE
AND EXPERTS:
The
Welfare of Ducks and Geese in Foie Gras Production: A summary of the Scientific
and Empirical Evidence Click
here for report.
2005
New York State pathologist report that foie gras birds were killed by
force feeding. Click
here for report. Read
article by same pathologist.
According
to an 88-page report issued by the European Scientific Committee on Animal
Health and Animal Welfare, entitled "Welfare Aspects of the Production
of Foie Gras in Ducks and Geese":
The problems
of the force feeding procedure are: (1) handling by humans which, in
the commercial force feeding situation, can cause aversion and discomfort
for ducks and geese, (2) the potentially damaging and distressing effects
of the tube which is inserted into the oesophagus, (3) the rapid intubation
of a large volume of food. . . ducks at the end of the force feeding
period can have serious injuries to the oesophagus. . . It seems likely
that birds have sufficient damage to oesophagus tissue, caused by the
force feeding process to have been painful to the birds.. . There is
good evidence that liver structure and function that would be classified
as normal is severely altered and compromised in force fed ducks and
geese. . . because normal liver function is seriously impaired in birds
with the hyperatrophied liver which occurs at the end of force feeding
the level of steatosis should be considered pathological. . . It is
clear that steatosis and other effects of force feeding are lethal when
the procedures are continued."
Click
here to read the full report.
Dr.
D.J. Alexander, a member of the EU Expert Committee, has stated, "The
only recommendation the Committee can properly make is that force feeding
of ducks and geese should stop and this could be best achieved by the
prohibition of the production, importation, distribution and sale of foie
gras."
Dr.
Holly Cheever, a veterinarian who has has inspected the United States
largest foie gras producer on three different occasions between January,
1991 and November, 2005, has testified
as to the cruelty inherent in foie gras production.
Click
here to read Dr. Cheever's explanations of the suffering experienced
by birds raised for foie gras.
Dr.
Laurie Siperstein-Cook, an avian veterinarian who examined and treated
several foie gras ducks, has stated, "I believe that the conditions
described, under which these birds were kept and the fact that they had
been force-fed to create an obese and unhealthy state constitutes unnecessary
cruelty."
Dr.
Siperstein-Cook has also stated, in reference to the fattening of the
liver for foie Gras production, that "The liver is there to clean
out toxins from the blood stream. If the liver can't work properly, you've
got all these toxins flowing through the blood, making them feel bad in
various ways, so it can harm various organs as well as the brain."
Click
here to read Dr. Siperstein-Cook's full statement.
Dr.
Emily Levine, a veterinarian and ethology expert, after viewing video
footage of ducks on a foie Gras farm, has stated:
I have
several professional concerns about the methods used to raise these
birds. . .. . although these animals have a genetic predisposition to
store larger amounts of fat in their liver, they do so for the specific
purpose of preparing to migrate. The birds in the industry do not migrate
and do not presumably receive the external environmental cues that would
normally signal them to begin to eat more than usual. In addition to
this, under natural situations, the birds eat a particular amount voluntarily.
In light of that, it is a false statement that the techniques the industry
uses is simply mimicking a natural behavior. Despite the misrepresentation
of the industry using natural techniques, force-feeding in itself can
cause significant discomfort.
Click
here for Dr. Levine's full statement.
An
autopsy performed on a foie Gras duck in July 2003 notes, "Bacterial
infection in the upper GI tract.. . .accompanied by severe impaction of
the crop and esophagus." It goes on to state that "[w]ithin
the liver, there is severe, diffuse macrovesicular lipidosis. The epithelium
of the crop and esophagus is hyperplastic with severe hyperkeratosis."
The
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations has declared:
The production
of fatty liver for foie Gras, however, raises serious animal welfare
issues and it is not a practice that is condoned by FAO. Currently European
Union legislation allows force feeding to continue only in traditional
areas of production. This situation could easily change and more restrictive
legislation introduced. Elsewhere, a number of European states have
already decided to ban altogether foie Gras production including Poland.
Hrayr
Berberoglu, a Professor Emeritus of Hospitality and Tourism Management
specializing in Food and Beverage, has been quoted as saying that "Force-feeding
is by all accounts a cruel way of raising an animal. . . the liver is
made incapable of functioning, thus becoming excessively fatty and smooth."
New
York State Department of Environmental Conservation senior wildlife pathologist
Ward Stone, who has necropsied force-fed ducks, said in a 1991 letter
to Sullivan County Animal Control that "[t]his type of treatment
and farming of waterfowl is outside the acceptable norms of agriculture
and sane treatment of animals."
In
his 1979 thesis, "Inspection des viandes Des oies et Des canards
Gras," presented to the Ecole Nationale Veterinaire de Toulouose
(ENVT) in France, Dr. Castets states:
At the end of their fattening the animals present the following signs:
- a heavy weight gain (may double),
- Pale skin and mucosas,
- A coat " sticky " because of a greasy coating
- Difficulty walking, abdominal ptosis (heavy abdomen) and dyspnea (panting).
... "
If the fattening process continues, the animals lie down, exhausted,
asphyxiated, to die..."
This is
the result of an endogenous intoxication due to the hepatic impairment;
the liver can no longer play its role as a circulatory filter. As a
result, various metabolites appear in the blood that are usually stopped
by the liver (ammonium, mercaptans, short-chain antigens) and that may
then reach the central nervous system (particularly sensitive to these
compounds) and trigger central nervous troubles such as:
- cerclage movements,
- eptileptiform crisis
- Increase of the intracranial pressure accompanied by migraines, and
finally stupor, coma and death.
. . . Beyond the hepatic and perihepatic lesions already evoked, steatosis
is part of a global pathologic process which ultimate level is non-reversible
and leads to the death of the individual due to hepatic failure. . .
This proves that fattened animals develop, to various degrees, depending
on their sensitivity, hepatic pathologies provoked by steatosis. Steatosis
cannot be considered a normal physiological process ; a steatosic liver
is indeed a pathologic liver.
Click
here to read more of Dr. Castet's report.
French
veterinarian Dr. Yvan Beck, in his comprehensive study, "The force-feeding
of poultry and the production of foie gras" writes:
foie gras
is in fact a diseased liver. . . Forced feeding of waterfowl, or food
induced hepatic steatosis, leads to pathological changes in the liver
which cause undeniable suffering to these animals. The economic goal
of the process is to effect the maximum change to this organ in the
minimum amount of time in order to maximize profits. It must, however,
be ended before the manifestations of degeneration, which are unavoidable
beyond a certain point, affect the quality (the powdery texture) of
the product or the overall health of the birds. . . . Moreover, at the
end of this process the birds are unable to make the slightest exertion,
which is the direct opposite of the purpose [of fatty buildup] under
natural conditions. . .There is no comparison between the natural buildup
of fats by waterfowl before migration, which occurs in peripheral tissue
(50% in the breast area), and the extreme conditions which result from
forced feeding.
A
group of nearly fifty New York veterinarians signed on to a petition declaring
foie gras production to be animal cruelty and calling for it to be banned
in the state.
The
World Society for the Protection of Animals (WSPA) issued a February 2000
report entitled "Forced Feeding: An inquiry into the welfare of ducks
and geese kept for the production of foie gras," in which it quotes
Dr. Heimann, a veterinary pathologist, as saying, "The liver steatosis
caused by 'gavage' is a pathological process that shows itself first by
a fatty degerneration of the hepatic cells and then by necrosis. The fatty
liver cannot be seen as normal. It is a categorical sign of a state of
illness with clinical symptoms."
Also quoted
in the 2000 WSPA report is veterinarian Dr. Eric Dunayer, who explained
that the liver steatosis induced by forced feeding would "cause the
animals to suffer from severe, debilitating metabolic diseases" and
that "since the liver is the site of detoxification of. . . many
substances, these chemicals will accumulate in the blood and cause an
animal to feel sick, upset normal cell function, and can lead to coma
and death."
The 2000
WSPA report also cites the comments of two other veterinarians commenting
on necropsies performed on foie gras ducks:
a. "Animals
in this condititon would experience constant pain. . . I consider the
production of foie gras to be inhumane as it deliberately harms the
duck."
b. "Having seen firsthand the terrible suffering of ducks. . .
confirmed by autopsy reports. . . I am forced to conclude that foie
gras is produced at a terrible cost to the birds themselves. Foie gras,
touted as a gourmet delicacy to entice the palate, is really only the
diseased tissue of a tortured, sick animal."
Christine
Nichol, a Professor of Animal Welfare at the School of Veterinary Science
at the University of Bristol, states:
My view
on the production of foie gras is clear and supported by biological
evidence. This practice causes unacceptable suffering to these animals.
. . It causes pain during and as a consequence of the force feeding,
feelings of malaise as the body struggles to cope with extreme nutrient
imbalance and distress caused by loss of control over the birds' most
basic homeostatic regulation mechanism as their hunger control system
is over-ridden.
In
February 2004, Dr. Ian Duncan, a poultry welfare expert and professor
in Applied Ethology at the University of Guelph in Canada, issued a "Statement
against the force-feeding of ducks and geese." In it, he explains that
"[f]orce
feeding quickly results in birds that are obese and in a pathological
state, called hepatic lipidosis or fatty liver disease. There is no
doubt that in this pathological state, the birds will feel very ill.
In my view it is completely unethical to deliberately promote a diseased
state in an animal. The birds' obesity will lead to a myriad of other
problems from skeletal disorders to difficulties in coping with heat
stress and all of which are accompanied by feelings of malaise."
Statement
by Jay Holcomb, Director and Karen Benzel, Public Affairs Director, International
Bird Rescue Research Center (IBRRC)
Statement
by Nedim
C. Buyukmihci a veterinarian with 30 years' experience
Does foie
gras amount to cruel and unusual punishment? with an absolute
yes.
The birds
do suffer during the feeding process. A stomach tube is rapidly forced
through the esophagus into the stomach, sometimes leading to injury,
and the huge amount of food being forced into the stomach causes harm
in and of itself. Not only does the liver become enlarged, it also malfunctions,
so the birds are chronically ill. The ducks are kept in crowded conditions,
and their bills, which are rich in nerve endings, are removed with scissors,
which causes acute and chronic pain and prevents normal feeding and
preening.
When you
consider what these birds must endure and the many other food
choices available--it seems that promoting foie gras reflects human
indulgence at its worst.
On
September 26, 2006, Alderman Joe Moore was joined at a press conference
by humane groups, animal experts, religious leaders and legal scholars
to express strong support for Chicagos ban on selling foie gras.
Click
here for written statements in support of the ban on foie gras.
|